Court stops EFCC from arresting businessman over alleged $1.9m money laundering charges
The Federal High Court sitting in Kaduna has granted an interim order restraining the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) from arresting or harassing a Dubai-based Nigerian businessman, Alhaji Rabiu Auwalu Tijjani, declared wanted by the commission over alleged $1.9m money laundering charges.
The applicant in the matter is Alhaji Rabiu Auwalu Tijjani, and the two respondents are EFCC and Mr. Ifeanyi Ezeokoli.
The order, granted on Monday by Justice H. Buhari, was in response to an ex parte motion filed by the applicant’s counsel on July 16, 2025, seeking protection of Alhaji Tijjani’s fundamental rights to liberty and freedom of movement as enshrined in Sections 35 and 46 of the 1999 Constitution.
Justice Buhari, having reviewed the application, granted an interim order restraining the EFCC from inviting, arresting, detaining, harassing, or prosecuting Alhaji Tijjani pending the hearing and determination of the substantive motion. The matter was adjourned to September 18, 2025, for further hearing.
SolaceBase had earlier reported that the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) declared Rabiu Auwalu Tijjani wanted over alleged money laundering involving $1,931,700.12.
The declaration was made in a notice signed by Dele Oyewale, Head of Media and Publicity at the EFCC, dated July 11, 2025.
Background of the Dispute
According to a sworn affidavit filed by Tijjani’s legal representative, Muhammad Zakariyya Dikko, Esq., the crisis began after the EFCC published Alhaji Tijjani’s name and photograph on its official website on July 11, 2025, declaring him wanted for alleged conspiracy, obtaining money by false pretence, and money laundering to the tune of $1,931,700.
Tijjani, a renowned international gold merchant and the first Nigerian licensed to establish a gold refinery in Nigeria, denied all allegations, describing the EFCC’s move as malicious and damaging to his reputation and business interests, especially his refinery project in Abuja.
The affidavit revealed that Tijjani had entered into a business transaction with Mr. Ifeanyi Ezeokoli in January 2022, involving the exchange of $76 million in Dubai for the naira equivalent in Nigeria. Following the transaction, Tijjani said he refunded an overpayment of ₦26 million to Mr. Ezeokoli after reconciling figures. However, he later discovered that he himself had overpaid Mr. Ezeokoli by over $2 million due to double entries.
Ongoing DSS Investigation
Tijjani reported the matter to the Department of State Services (DSS), after several attempts to ensure reconciliation of accounts with Ifeanyi failed.
Upon this, both parties agreed to an independent audit, which allegedly revealed fictitious addresses for the companies linked to the overpaid funds. The audit reportedly took six months due to the volume of documents involved.
Read Also: UK must stop Nigerians from staying for relative period to acquire British citizenship- Badenoch
The affidavit said Mr. Ezeokoli became uncooperative during the investigation and instead filed a petition at the EFCC Kaduna Zonal Office, which Tijjani alleges was done to cover up fraudulent dealings and to escape DSS scrutiny.
Despite submitting documents to EFCC Kaduna through a representative and not receiving any further invitation or query, Tijjani was shocked to find himself declared wanted by the anti-graft agency. He argued that he was never invited in writing, nor was he contacted by the EFCC before the public notice, which he said violated his fundamental rights.
He further claimed that the viral EFCC publication caused widespread embarrassment, with family, friends, and global business associates questioning his integrity, and his foreign investors reconsidering their involvement in the refinery project.
Justice Buhari, having reviewed the application, granted an interim order restraining the EFCC from inviting, arresting, detaining, harassing, or prosecuting Alhaji Tijjani pending the hearing and determination of the substantive motion. The matter was adjourned to September 18, 2025, for further hearing.
Comments are closed.