Northern Nigerian Breaking News

Open Contracting Portals: From transparency tools to forgotten promises in Kano

By Aminu Abubakar

Open Contracting Portals were originally designed as critical tools for promoting accountability and transparency in governance.

These digital platforms are meant to provide citizens with access to vital information, including the names of contractors awarded public projects, the value of contracts, timelines for completion, and the processes followed in awarding them. In many states, these portals are referred to as “Due Process” platforms.

However, over time, several Nigerian states have abandoned or neglected these platforms, undermining their purpose and compromising public trust.

A SolaceBase review of the Kano State Due Process website reveals glaring negligence in the government’s management of the platform.

elsamad new

Read Also:High poverty rate fails to deter frivolous spending by Kano, Kaduna state govts

For example, the website for listing constituency projects—https://dueprocess.kn.gov.ng/constituency-projects/—is currently inaccessible and displays a “404 Error” page. Additionally, the state’s listed e-procurement portal, edueprocess.com, is also not accessible.

CLICK ON THE BANNER FOR MORE DETAILS

AD 4nXdOx397LfMymsKech0O8xkme5DVD7wM3gUoRobZjmrk7jbgyQeVvau fmhndplgwM 5SWG41SeVM5h7Fvpjz7We2FKur0eTmKjpJPEBkk2VB380dFQlsg9yaqHKbiA2LYIhueKV?key=k5bTld5AuG4VTjs

The portal for constituency projects continuously shows “Error404”

While the Kano Due Process website mentions ministries such as Works, Education, Health, Environment, and SUBEB, only a single link—“OCDS2020”—is functional for each ministry, and even those links display only a limited number of contract awards. Beyond this, none of the ministries have working or updated links detailing specific contracts.

Read Also:Amid out-of-school children and water scarcity, Sokoto approves N1.6bn for lawmakers’ vehicles in 2025

According to the Kano State Budget Performance Report, the government spent N108.8 billion on capital expenditure in 2024. Yet, the failure to maintain a functional open contracting portal deprives residents of critical information—such as who was awarded what contracts, how much each project cost, and the procedures followed in the procurement process.

AD 4nXf31g1m9DI zGhHhG5nJUWBCQP4QUBZ4Ir5QFE3R4boB0dY6HrN7ZOFO9zvlsDZGpDJwfqqFSLxFBW017wd tiuTFp6jfixE28G9IMzOzimLuqqd5iXEEor8nlJfoSmiKE3HgpwjA?key=k5bTld5AuG4VTjs

While the portal lists different items, only “Ocds 2020 works with a few items listed there.

AD 4nXdI5p0gPA3jydOYTBkyn4V4Enzp39qQLz7wPx4HZW4hljBRZt7FAKcmuvDNXL42T EDuQQ0STl1s6poXdMv12icqTPgggCvMh40UlbX09 e48j19SWNbIzGPGOZj1e 7rWgjBy7TQ?key=k5bTld5AuG4VTjs

List of contract awards for the Ministry of Education under “OCDS 2020”

Subscribe to our newsletter

This lack of transparency contradicts the stated importance of Open Contracting Portals. 

“Open contracting is about publishing timely and accessible procurement information in order to engage the public in identifying and fixing problems around procurement. Kaduna State, since joining the Open Government Partnership, is dedicated to providing citizens and the public with access to procurement information,” the Open Contracting Partnerships noted in a statement.

Read Also:Report accuses ex- Katsina electoral commission director of withdrawing N546m from SIEC account without value for money

The Kano State governor, Abba Yusuf, in November 2024, promised to ensure transparency and accountability in governance, yet a tool such as the Open Contracting Portal remains non-functional.

The consequences of such opacity are far-reaching.

In August 2024, SolaceBase reported a major corruption case handled by the Kano State Public Complaints and Anti-Corruption Commission (PCACC) that interrogated three interim Local Government Chairmen. The issue revolved around an alleged multibillion-naira contract scam.

According to the report, N660 million—part of N1.1 billion approved by Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf for the 44 local governments to address water and medical supply challenges—was allegedly mismanaged. The funds were earmarked for projects running from August to October 2024, with N25 million allocated to each local government per month.

Such incidents highlight the urgent need for transparency in procurement processes. According to national reports, over 60% of corruption cases in Nigeria are linked to open contracting-related issues—emphasizing the critical role that accessible, updated, and functional portals could play in curbing corruption.

Kano State suffers from gaps in developmental needs, which would mean that there is an utmost need for monies that are allocated for projects to be well utilised and judiciously monitored.

According to the multidimensional poverty index data, there are 4.60 million persons who are poor in Kano State. The data review further shows that 35% of children of school age in the state are denied access to education, another 51% households are denied access to sanitary facilities, while 31% are denied access to clean drinking water.

Read Also:Kano, Jigawa, Katsina, Zamfara, can’t pay salaries with IGR in 2025

If the state would ameliorate the challenges, it would continue to pump billions into capital projects and contracts, experts however argue that a functional open Contracting portal helps reduce corruption in the contractual processes by promoting open governance and transparency.

A report by BudGit ranked Kano State low in terms of fiscal transparency as of first quarter 2024. Kano State ranked twenty-ninth out of thirty-six states of the country with a score of forty-two points out of a hundred.

Conclusion

Open Contracting Portals were established to strengthen transparency, empower citizens, and reduce corruption. The abandonment and neglect of these platforms, especially in states like Kano and Kaduna, not only betray public trust but also violate the principles of good governance.

As billions of naira are allocated and spent annually on capital projects, Nigerians deserve access to the full details of how those funds are used. It’s time for states to revive these tools, ensure regular updates, and truly embrace open governance—not just in rhetoric, but in practice.

Comments are closed.