Northern Nigerian Breaking News

JUST IN: Serve Charge On Ex-Customs Boss, Dikko- Court Orders Lawyer

4

A Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday ordered lawyers to former Comptroller General of Customs (CGC), Abdullahi Inde Dikko to serve him a charge pending against him (Dikko) before the court.

The Independent Corrupt Practices and other related offences Commission (ICPC)  had filed the charge in 2018 in which it accused Dikko and two others of defrauding the Managing Director of Cambial Limited, Yemi Obadeyi of N1.1bilion.

The anti-graft agency  said it served the charge on the other two defendants – Garba Makarfi (a former Assistant Comptroller in charge of finance at the Nigeria Customs Service) and Umar Husseini (a lawyer) – ,but has been unable to serve Dikko since it was filed last year.

The ICPC, on the last date, applied under the Administration of Criminal Justice Act (ACJA) for the charge to be served on the ex-Customs boss through the lawyer that represented him during investigation.

At the resumed hearing on Tuesday, Abdullahi Inde Dikko (the first defendant) was absent, while Makarfi and Husseini were present  in court.

elsamad new

Prosecuting Counsel , Adenekan Shogunle said in compliance with court’s order, the charge has been served on the law firm of Mahmud A. Magaji (SAN) & Co for onward delivery to the first defendant (Dikko).

Although a lawyer from the law firm, Miss. B. O. Odigie said the charge was wrongly served on her firm, and that she has filed an application to challenge the service of the charge on the chamber.

She said her firm was not briefed by the first defendant to represent him in this case, although the firm was representing Dikko in other cases.

When confronted with a letter tendered by the prosecution, marked: “Exhibit ICPC 2,” in which the law firm undertook to produce Dikko whenever his presence was required, Odigie sought time to “put her house in order.”

The presiding Judge,  Justice Ijeoma Ojukwu told Odigie that her firm was only required to hand the charge to the first defendant as ordered by the court.

The judge said the court was not interested on whether or not the law firm was briefed to handle the case on behalf of the first defendant or otherwise.

More later…

4 Comments
  1. nova88 says

    352626 659325This really is such a fantastic resource that youre offering and you supply out at no cost. I appreciate seeing sites that realize the worth of offering a perfect valuable resource completely free. I genuinely loved reading your submit. 334815

  2. 659109 844935I gotta favorite this site it seems invaluable extremely beneficial 118050

  3. WordPress Hosting says

    597562 411775I think this is among the most significant info for me. And im glad reading your post. But want to remark on some common issues, The internet website style is perfect, the articles is actually excellent : D. Good job, cheers 242710

  4. sbo says

    278109 807709 very nice post, i definitely enjoy this website, keep on it 490241

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.