The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), BudgIT, Enough is Enough (EiE) and 583 concerned Nigerians have filed a lawsuit to stop President Muhammadu Buhari and Zainab Ahmed, Minister of Finance, Budget and National Planning from releasing N37 billion allocated for the renovation of the National Assembly complex to the Federal Capital Development Agency and the National Assembly.
The concerned citizens are asking the Federal High Court, Abuja to restrain the release of the fund for the renovation of the National Assembly
The groups are similarly asking a court order to stop the Senate President, Ahmad Lawan; Speaker of the House of Representatives, Femi Gbajabiamila and the Federal Capital Development Agency from collecting the N37 billion set aside for the renovation of the National Assembly complex until an impact assessment of the spending on critical sectors and access to public goods and services are carried out.
Read Also: JUST IN: Buhari Signs 2020 Budget Of N10.594trn(Opens in a new browser tab)
The suit with the number FHC/ABJ/CS/1633/2019 filed last week had the plaintiffs argued: “The National Assembly complex should be a safe and conducive environment for those who work there. But spending ₦37 billion to renovate the place is not commensurate with the constitutional commitments to public services and goods; decreasing public revenues and increasing level of debts as well as the poor economic and social realities in the country.”
The plaintiffs in the suit similarly argued: “Spending N37 billion to renovate the National Assembly complex is self-serving, wrongful, illegal and unconstitutional expenditure of public funds, as it means less money for educating millions of out-of-school Nigerian children, providing access to clean water and healthcare to Nigerians including the elderly, or repairing the country’s roads and bridges.”
The 583 concerned Nigerians who joined the suit as co-plaintiffs include: Bring Back Our Girls (BBOG) co-convener Aisha Yesufu; Nigerian singer and actor Banky Wellington; Mrs. Ayo Obe; Fisayo Soyombo and Dr Abiola Akiyode-Afolabi.
The suit, which was filed by Kolawole Oluwadare and Opeyemi Owolabi, read in part: “The defendants are public officers who have sworn the constitutional oaths of office to perform their respective duties in the interest of Nigerian citizens.
The refusal of President Buhari to object to the Budget/Appropriation Bill containing a huge N37 billion on the renovation of the National Assembly complex is a gross violation of the constitution and existing laws in Nigeria.
“The National Assembly complex was reportedly constructed at the cost of $35.18 Million USD in 1999 and ₦40.2 Billion Naira was budgeted in December 2013 for the construction of phase III of the National Assembly Complex and renovation of the first and second phases of the complex.”
“The 2020 Budget is in a deficit of ₦2.175 Trillion with anticipated revenue at ₦8.42 Trillion Naira and proposed expenditure of ₦10.594 Trillion.”
“The present-day economic reality in Nigeria includes chronic poverty amongst a high percentage of citizens and the inability of many state governments to pay salaries of workers and pensions. Unless the reliefs sought are granted, the Defendants will take benefit of the allocated N37 billion at the expense of many Nigerians living in poverty.”
“The crux of the Plaintiffs’ argument is better expressed in the question: Why should the nation spend so much on a building when there are other important areas of national infrastructure that can be developed in order to affect a greater number of citizens?”
The group asked the court to determine: “Whether N37 billion proposed, voted and allocated for renovation of the National Assembly Complex in the 2020 Nigerian National Budget via Appropriation Act 2019 by the National Assembly and signed into law by President Buhari is not in breach of the Code of Conduct for Public Officers [Fifth Schedule Part 1] of the Nigerian Constitution of 1999 [as amended] and Oath of a Member of the National Assembly.”
183151 592682I like this web blog very much so much superb info . 118834
50656 374409My wife style of bogus body art were being quite unsafe. Mother worked with gun initial, right after which they your lover snuck free upon an tattoo ink ink. I was positive the fact just about every need to not be epidermal, due to the tattoo ink could be attracted from the entire body. make an own temporary tattoo 215247
404941 800154Utterly composed topic material , thanks for selective details . 636661
400652 28648But yet another intelligent weblog! Completely cannot wait for a good deal more! 39922