Umar Labdo And Sarkin Kano Muhammad Sanusi II: Between Hatred And Patriotism

By Ibrahim Ado-Kurawa

Umar Labdo has made himself the most vocal and virulent critic of Sarkin Kano Muhammad Sanusi II (the Emir of Kano) in the social media. He overstepped his bounds by being rude to the Emir. He has made wide-ranging accusations, alleging that the Emir is an agent of the Western powers who are trying to destroy Muslims. He wrote in Hausa Language and his purpose is to get the Emir deposed because he said the Emir is not working in the interest of the people and they will not shed any tears. He did this to provide justification for the enemies of the Emir who want to finish him and frighten all alternative voices from the public space.

It would be recalled that former Zamfara State Governor, Ahmad Sani Yarima was the first Governor to launch the Shari’a Criminal Law and all other Muslim majority states in the North followed his example. Most of the Ulama (Cleric) supported him. Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi who was not the Emir of Kano at that time wrote critical essays against the way the Shari’a was implemented arguing that it was politically motivated.

Read Also: Zamfara Commissioner Resigns, Lambasts Gov. Matawalle(Opens in a new browser tab)

This was because according to him the Governors were not concerned about the economic development of their states they were only interested in penal laws to divert the attention of the citizens from their bad governance. He used classical Fiqh sources to write against the Judgments of lower Shari’a Courts that convicted accused persons including Safiya for adultery. Most of what he wrote about Shari’a implementation has been vindicated as correct critique because politicians have since abandoned the cause and are more concerned with their positions.

Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi became Sarkin Kano Muhammad Sanusi II and he pledged to spearhead the reform of Muslim Family Law. As someone who is also knowledgeable in the field of Shari’a, with a first-class degree he knows it is not an easy task. It was also part of his social reform initiative. Therefore he initiated it, in collaboration with Bayero University Kano. Scholars from the university and the city were brought together and they worked for two years. Many of the city scholars have been teaching Maliki Fiqh for over thirty years some of them can teach Labdo for ten years before they certify him. Their draft was debated. Those who had reservations from the scholarly community were given the opportunity. Every issue was discussed in a scholarly manner and resolved. The scholars unanimously accepted more than ninety percent of the draft law. No sub-Saharan African Muslim community has ever done this.

Read Also: Nigeria To Introduce New Visa Regime To Boost Economy

Hence the President of Niger Republic invited Emir Sanusi to speak to his people on the need for similar reform. This is why people like Labdo, who, parade himself as scholars, are jealous. I challenge Labdo or any of his fellow propagandists to come up with a scholarly critique of that draft Law. They can only speak to the gallery without any coherent scholarly exposition because they think most people are ignorant and those who are educated would succumb to their cheap blackmail of branding them as enemies and agents of the West. This is cowardice and hate speech.

Labdo has berated Emir Sanusi for not bringing any developmental project in the last five years claiming that he has not built any school or anything tangible. On the other hand, he alleged that Sanusi has been spending for himself and the palace. This is where Labdo has demonstrated his hatred. Even if Sanusi stops spending anything for himself and diverts it to the society he would not wipe out poverty and ignorance. Or he should just do it please people like Labdo. On the other hand if Sanusi is able to secure a major policy thrust, it could bring about the needed change not superficial change.

For example, if the Muslim Family Law reform is accepted then orphans, divorcees and widows would be protected. The weak would have access to education and dignified life. This is what people like Labdo do not want. They want perpetual ignorance to feed people with their propaganda and hate-mongering.

If the reform succeeds which Labdo does not like. There would be less abandoned children. People would be compelled to take care of their children and to end domestic violence. What are the major problems of Kano society today that have no root in the breakdown of the family? He says Sanusi has not done anything to fight drug abuse is it because he has more capacity than NDLEA? On the contrary while Sanusi is urging reform to enhance the family and protect the weak propagandist like Labdo are tagging him as a Western agent.

Labdo is blinded by hatred hence he claims that Sanusi did not bring any development to Kano, in the last five years despite his connection. This is very absurd who amongst those who have authority has ever brought any development to any domain in five years? All Nigerians are living witnesses to the problem of power in Nigeria. Even in Kano, the State Government’s independent power project has been going on for two tenures (eight years). What about the Federal level, which is common knowledge, how many megawatts have been added since 1999? Yet Labdo wants Sanusi to perform miracles. Sanusi’s fault is that he is the Chair of Black Rhino Group, the largest consortium in power investment in Africa. He gave condition that the company must invest in Kano before he accepted the Chairmanship. They are committing $5billion in Africa for investment in the power sector. He has met all those concerned and followed all the processes. His fault is that he has not delivered in five years what the Nigerian State has not delivered in twenty years.

Labdo is in the Faculty of Humanities where he is a Professor yet he believes that an Emir can bring about economic development in five years. He is angry that Emir Sanusi’s supporters have brought elders to stop the Governor from deposing him. They are doing this because they know the value of Emir Sanusi to his people unlike the Professor in the Faculty of Humanities.

It was because of Emir Sanusi that the African Development Bank (ADB) hired and paid an international consulting firm to make Industrial Diagnostics for Kano State, it has not been done for any sub-national entity in Africa. Without such groundwork no investor will come to Kano. It is as a result of Emir Sanusi’s efforts that a Chinese firm is arranging to invest $300 million in one of the textile firms in Kano. The development partners have agreed to interface with the company’s creditors in Nigeria to reschedule outstanding debt to enable the Chinese investors to acquire the company.

Even if it takes Emir Sanusi ten years to bring $300 million investment it cannot be a fault because no traditional ruler has ever done that for any domain in Nigeria. Even if it is only the Industrial Diagnostics that was done because of him it is enough, which Nigerian traditional ruler has ever done that for his domain, when Kano is the first sub-national entity in Africa to benefit from this support from ADB because of its Emir.

Labdo claims that Emir Sanusi is destroying the Sarauta. Well, there is a need for evidence. And that is if Labdo even knows what Sarauta means. He claims that the Emir is spending money on the Palace but still believes that he is desecrating the institution according to his malicious allegation based on hatred. Sarkin Kano Muhammad Rumfa (1463-1499) constructed Gidan Rumfa (the Palace). It is the largest and oldest continuous seat of authority in Sub Saharan Africa. There were many before it but not as large or have ceased to serve any useful function. Most of the buildings in the palace are centuries old and have become health hazards. Emir Sanusi decided to pull them down with the little resources available. He maintained the maghrebian Islamic style in the architecture. This made him the most influential builder in the palace history after Sarkin Kano Muhammadu Rumfa. The option for him was to use the resources as advised by Labdo instead of maintaining Gidan Rumfa, such usage would have little or no effect on the lives of people of Kano but for propaganda value. The other alternative is to allow the palace to be destroyed gradually as other ancient monuments.

So what is Sarauta? It was kingship and now it is leadership. What do we expect of Sanusi? Many believe he should never talk on any social or economic issue. He should just keep quiet in the face of anything. They believe that was, the attitude of his predecessor and the norm. If Sarauta is leadership it means the Emir should not be silent. Emir Sanusi is obviously not perfect. But in terms of economic policy should he permanently keep quiet? Is that fair to Nigeria? The best Central Bank Governor should be silenced. Is that democracy? Obviously not, it is not even Sarauta.

They say he must give advice in private, is that democracy? Long before the Federal Government closed the borders, he recommended it. So why is he not being commended? Even people like Labdo and his other co-destructive preachers commended Emir Sanusi when he boldly condemned that Shiism has no roots in Nigeria. At that time Labdo never claimed he was working for the West. Emir also confronted Boko Haram on the pulpit and at every given opportunity, he boosted the morale of his people and inspired them to remain steadfast as expected of a leader, so he was, therefore, a Western agent, as propagandists like Labdo want us to believe.

People like Labdo are destructive preachers because they are hate mongers. They think they own the Shari’ah and can determine who is and who is not Muslim. Even on matters of jihad where there are differences of opinion among scholars they still appropriate who is and who is not Muslim. You may disagree with Emir Sanusi on his daughter representing him at an occasion, or his views against domestic violence and the right of women to retaliate. Even if he is wrong does that make him anti-Shari’ah and interested only in promoting Western values? What about his pioneering initiative on Muslim Family Law reform using classical texts that people like Labdo or their masters cannot dream of initiating?

The problem of destructive preachers like Labdo apart from hatred and extremism is ignorance of social reality. Out of this ignorance, they believe Northern Nigeria is a perfect Muslim society that does not need social reform. Hence any attempt to reform is Western-inspired.

For example, they are against girl child education by supporting early marriage for the children of the poor but for their children they can proceed up to the university. They do not realize that stopping girls from schooling has long-term implications on society. Even at the layman’s level how can you have enough female health workers if you allow people to marry off their daughters below the age of eighteen? People must speak against this practice despite hate mongers and that is why Emir Sanusi incurs their hatred.

People like Labdo want to enjoy the fruits of technology yet out of ignorance they don’t know what its impediments in the Northern Muslim society are.

The most critical problems are lack of equity and access to education in Northern Nigeria because of cultural barriers that people like Labdo do not understand. All Muslim societies outside black Africa have passed this archaic stage. In Malaysia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Turkey, Morocco and many other places Muslim students have access to education because of reforms but not in Northern Nigeria. Emir Sanusi is one of the few people who understand this. He is the only Muslim leader who has spoken publicly that language should not be a barrier to education. He made the most cogent advocacy for the Qur’anic students and scholars that they must not be relegated to permanent disenfranchisement because they do not have proficiency in the English Language. Emir Sanusi is the only leader who has given much commitment to advocacy on the need to teach sciences and other subjects in vernacular to accommodate the disenfranchised poor people of Northern Nigeria. Yet he is an agent of the West because he called for the incorporation of Qur’anic students into the educational system something people like Labdo can never do and when they do no one will listen to them because they are nonentities.

Yes, Emir Sanusi is very vocal when it comes to the introspection of the Northern Muslim society. You may disagree with him. But he does it out of patriotism. He does not believe in a blame game that is for shallow people like Labdo. When Emir Sanusi speaks about the problems of Nigeria he does from the position of strength. He does not regard the cultural practices that retard northern Nigeria as Islamic or sacrosanct.

Hence if people negligent their duties he would speak against it no matter how bitter that may be. He does not believe in blaming other ethnic groups for poverty in Northern Nigeria. Some of the northern states are the poorest in this planet while other Southern states if they are not in Nigeria, would rise higher in the scale of prosperity so Northern Nigeria pulls them down. Emir Sanusi says it as it is. Whereas people like Labdo promote ethnocentrism and intolerance.

An example of such ethnocentrism and intolerance was Labdo’s interview in The Punch newspaper of February 3, 2018, it was a very convoluted outing unbecoming of a Professor in the Faculty of Humanities. He provided the fodder for ethnic hatred and animosity in Nigeria. Here is a Professor claiming that Fulani have right of conquest to certain areas in Nigeria including areas that were never even under the Sokoto Caliphate. What kind of person is this who claims that Tiv descended from Fulani and Jukun? Using it to claim rights over Benue. What kind of person is this who would regard Abuja as Fulani gift to Nigeria because it was part of North-Western State. The Punch asked him: Which other states or areas do you think belong to the Fulani by right of conquest?

He answered: “For example, many of those who followed my post and responded were asking, now, can you say that Abuja belongs to Fulani? Yes, Abuja belongs to Sokoto, even as late as 1975, Abuja was part of Sokoto before the coup that terminated Yakubu Gowon’s administration. Abuja was part of North-Western State, with Sokoto as the capital. What we know as Niger State today was under Sokoto. And that is why we have Suleja because when the Fulani donated Abuja to Nigeria, they took the Emir from Abuja to Suleja; go and read the history”.

Emir Sanusi is almost the opposite of Labdo. He cannot make these ignorant claims to defend the Fulani people. Labdo the Professor does not even know the origin of Abuja, yet he wants to speak about it? What kind of person is this? It was not a Fulani territory in pre-colonial Northern Nigeria. In fact the Hausa rulers of Zazzau established it when they were chased out of Zazzau. It is unfortunate that people like Labdo even have a space in the intellectual arena of this country. Labdo said he did it deliberately as his people the Fulani must attack presumably with fables not history as the basis of the narrative. On the contrary, Emir Sanusi in his defense of the Fulani cattle owners provided the intellectual basis of their rights, as citizens and he became one of their most influential defenders when they faced extermination whereas Labdo’s convoluted fables increased their enemies. Hence people like Labdo will always campaign and say Emir Sanusi is agent of the West to expose the Nigerian citizens to hatred of one another thus doing a disservice to humanity.

Labdo is jealous that Emir Sanusi is recognized across the world for his achievement in the management of the Nigerian Economy and his advocacy for educational inclusion.

Hence because of hatred, he says the Westerners promote Emir Sanusi for working for them against his people. When Sanusi worked to save the Nigerian banking sector he did it for the Westerners. When Sanusi saved Nigerian depositors he did it for the Westerners. When Sanusi raised the revenue that CBN remitted to the Federation to the highest level for the first time he did it for the Westerners. When Sanusi made sure almost all Federal institutions benefitted from the CBN Corporate Social Responsibility across the whole country he did it for the Westerners. It is the reason that many public universities across the country honor Sanusi more than any other Nigerian ever, because his landmark is visible not imagined on their campuses.

When Sanusi blew the whistle against the NNPC fraud of $20billion and lost his job for the APC to use it as weapon against the PDP he was doing it for the Westerners. This is, why those who value sacrifice respect Sanusi when his enemies like Labdo who value mediocrity and ethnocentrism, want him removed from the Emirship, those who have sympathy for patriotism rose up to support him.

Labdo carpeted them for supporting Emir Sanusi. Unfortunately for Labdo, Emir Sanusi is loved all over the world because of his achievements and patriotism. On the other hand who is Labdo in academic circles only in his locality? He is a minion in the academic world. The world has changed. Does Labdo appear in high impact refereed journals to help elevate the position of his university’s world ranking or is he a local champion with no position in the academic peer-reviewed world. Just search any peered reviewed high impact journal or even www.jstor.org how many times the word Labdo appeared? They are all merit-based, so people like Labdo cannot appear hence, his hatred of the excellence in public service, as Sanusi exemplified, and his backwardness in his academic calling.

Ibrahim Ado-Kurawa, a researcher writes from Kano and can be reached on
ibrahimado@yahoo.com